Practices of External Collaboration for Policy Design (Work Package 5 – WP5)

 

Led by Tallinn University of Technology (Estonia), this work package run from September 2018 until November 2021.

The WP5 team examined the conditions and practices of external collaboration in policy design, focusing specifically on e-participation platforms, with the aim of contributing to improved understanding of success factors of such initiatives.

It sought to explore the influence of e-participation initiatives on policy design and collaboration with citizens, and to develop policy recommendations for further improvement of organisation and administration of e-participation initiatives. In its research, WP5 addressed the following questions:

  • How are e-participation platforms launched and institutionalised?
  • How is the interaction between the government and the non-governmental stakeholders organised and administered through the e-participation platforms?
  • What are the critical success factors in organising and administering e-participation initiatives and the main lessons learned during the implementation of such initiatives?

To answer these questions, the WP5 team conducted seven case studies and looked into:

  • National-, organizational -and individual-level factors explaining the establishment and functioning of e-participation initiatives,
  • The evidence of the influence of e-participation initiatives on the actual policy design,
  • The effects and implications of e-participation initiatives on collaboration with stakeholders and citizens.

 

Research

In the first step, the WP5 team carried out empirical analysis of recent e-participation initiatives with the objective of fostering collaboration between governments and citizens, in seven European countries (Estonia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and the UK). The case studies were selected based on a joint case study protocol, following a multidisciplinary perspective, and covering politico-administrative, socio-cultural, and technical factors. See D5.1 Comparative case studies on e-participation.

The functioning of these e-participation platforms was further investigated by a comparative analysis of the cases, with a special emphasis on the “supply-side” of e-participation – the administrative and organizational context of such initiatives. See D5.2 Organising for e-participation: Learning from European Experiences.

Based on the empirical findings from the case studies, the WP5 team aimed at systematising critical institutional aspects in the adoption of e-participation. They presented a list of supply-related success factors of e-participation, which provides valuable information to policymakers who are involved in the establishment of new and improvement of existing e-participation platforms. These results are easily accessible in the form of a Policy Brief offering recommendations and might contribute to the development of both existing and new e-participation initiatives. See D5.3 Success factors for organizing and administering e-participation Policy Brief.

 

 

Results and findings

The research carried out in WP5 demonstrates that the impact of technology on the public sector is strongly mediated by the institutional context that frames the ways public sector interacts with citizens and other governmental and non-governmental units contributing to participatory policymaking. The organisational setup, process design, managerial quality and allocated resources play a crucial role in the collaborative efforts ensuring the functioning, continuous improvement and eventual sustainability of the e-participation platforms. Multifaceted organisational structures and processes combined with the complexity of the surrounding societal and political context make e-participation systems prone to fail and require them to be managed as a process of learning and adaptation rather than a static technological product. The case studies show that due to barriers in the institutional framework and relevant processes, e-participation platforms may end up struggling with low demand and acceptance. There is a need to re-think how governments should be vertically and horizontally integrated in the days of fast-changing technology in order to constantly adapt the system to contextual changes. As a result of comparative analysis of case studies, four groups of supply-related success factors have been elaborated: 1) the factors related to organisational design, 2) the factors related to participatory process, 3) the factors related to management, and 4) the other supply-related success factors. Considering that the supply-related success factors are the ones over which the government has direct influence, WP5 has outlined practical challenges that public administrations face in the organisation and administration of e-participation platforms in order to provide a systematic framework for addressing them in the future.

 

Scientific publications

The WP5 team will publish in February 2022 the edited volume Engaging Citizens in Policy Making. e-Participation Practices in Europe (Edward Elgar Publishing). Exploring academic and policy thinking on e-participation, this book opens up the organizational and institutional 'black box' and provides new insights into how public administrations in 15 European states have facilitated its implementation.

 

Several articles have been published by the WP5 team on e-participation:

 

Randma-Liiv, T. (2021). Organizing e-participation: Challenges stemming from the multiplicity of actors. Public Administration.

This study investigates how different organizations and their units are involved in the supply of e-participation initiatives, and how the multiplicity of actors affects cross-boundary collaboration, ownership, and accountability relations in the implementation of e-participation initiatives, based on the WP5 comparative case studies on e-participation platforms in seven European countries.

Defacqz, S., & Dupuy, C. (2021). Usages of an E-Participation Platform by Legislators: Lessons from the French Parliament. French Politics.

The article intends to advance the study of e-participation in renewed directions by focusing on a category of actors that has long been overlooked: elected politicians. It zeroes in on legislators who while key actors of representative democracy chose to be involved in an e-participation initiative.

Royo, S., Pina, V., & Garcia-Rayado, J. (2020). Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1674.

This publication focuses on “Decide Madrid” – an award-winning e-participation initiative in Spain, and delineates main success factors and barriers that are conditioning the initiative’s performance.

 

Upcoming publications will be shared on the TROPICO community on the repository Zenodo.

 

The team

Led by Tallinn University of Technology (Estonia), the WP5 team included partners in six countries: Cardiff University (The UK), Erasmus University Rotterdam (The Netherlands), French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)/ Grenoble Institute of Political Studies (France), University of Louvain (Belgium), and University of Potsdam (Germany).

 

 

Downloads

Icon

D5.1 - Comparative case studies on e-participation 1.14 MB 870 downloads

The publication presents the empirical analysis of recent e-participation initiatives...

Icon

D5.2 - Organising for e-participation: Learning from European Experiences 1.24 MB 416 downloads

This report investigates the functioning of e-participation platforms in seven European...

Icon

D5.3 - Policy brief - Success factors for organizing and administering e-participation 811.29 KB 339 downloads

The Policy Brief offers recommendations to policymakers who are involved in establishing...

Icon

Policy brief on the citizen participation (in French) 342.45 KB 65 downloads

This policy brief (French language) focuses on the e-participation platforms investigated...

Icon

Article by Sonia Royo, Vicente Pina and Jaime Garcia-Rayado - "Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative" 0.00 KB 54 downloads

This publication focuses on “Decide Madrid” – an award-winning e-participation...

WP5 TEAM MEMBERS

Benedetta Bellò

Cardiff University

United Kingdom

Nora Carstens

University of Potsdam

Germany

Samuel Defacqz

UCLouvain

Belgium

Claire Dupuy

UCLouvain

Belgium

Julia Fleischer

University of Potsdam

Germany

WP Leader: WP4

Erik Hans Klijn

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Netherlands

Per Lægreid

University of Bergen

Norway

Steven Nõmmik

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia

Andree Pruin

University of Potsdam

Germany

Tiina Randma Liiv

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia

WP Leader: WP5

Lise H. Rykkja

University of Bergen

Norway

TROPICO Coordinator

Külli Sarapuu

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia

Line Marie Sørsdal

University of Bergen

Norway

Vidar Stevens

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Netherlands

Kadi Maria Vooglaid

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia