Practices of Internal Collaboration for Policy Design (Work Package 4 – WP4)

 

Led by the University of Potsdam (Germany), this work package conducted research from April 2018 to May 2021.

The WP4 team studied the emergence and nature of innovative collaboration in policy design inside governments. A special emphasis was given to the role of governments and the relevance of ICT in intra-and intergovernmental collaboration. Three main research questions were investigated:

  • How do ICT affect policy design inside governments, and have they led to innovative collaboration practices?
  • What are the main drivers and obstacles for such practices?
  • How do institutional, organizational, and individual features shape the implementation of innovative collaboration practices within governments?

To answer these questions, the WP4 team focused on:

  • Actor constellations and actors' capabilities,
  • Collaboration means, especially the application and suitability of ICT,
  • Institutional and governmental conditions shaping actors and means and their inter-linkages.

 

Research

The WP4 team first conducted an inter-disciplinary academic expert survey, examining digitalisation and collaboration in European governments and involving social scientists, legal scholars, historians, and economists with a special competence to assess such questions. Covering ten countries, the survey focused on the experts' perceptions and assessments of internal policy design, i.e. the  structures  and  processes  to  formulate  government  policies  within  government organisations, with a special emphasis on perceptions of the role of novel and innovative ICT tools as means for executive collaboration. It analysed the impact of digitalisation for policy design, presented expert assessments of portfolio salience, and discussed the role of delegated agencies in providing expertise and internal policy design. It thus aimed at complementing existing 'governance indicators' and shedding light on collaboration and digitalisation dynamics from a comparative perspective. See D4.2 Research Report - Academic Expert Survey.

Next, the WP4 team conducted comparative in-depth case studies across five European countries (Germany, France, Hungary, Netherlands, and Norway) based on a joint analytical framework using semi-structured expert interviews and document analysis. Based on the five case studies, the researchers analysed the means (e.g. technicalities) of the initiatives, their set-up conditions, actors involved, and their role in the decision-making process. The case study report analyses the scope, formality and intensity of these initiatives as well as their direct and indirect effects on decision-making and their parent organisations. See D4.3 Comparative Case Studies.

Empirical observations and implications resulting from the academic expert survey and the comparative case studies are summarized in a Policy Brief, underlining key findings, practical implications, and recommendations. See D4.4 Policy brief - Innovative collaboration for policy design through ICT.

 

Results and findings

Our results illustrate the importance of ICT tools in the public sector for innovative and collaborative policy design. ICT tools contribute to increasing exchange and processing of information, support the harmonisation of administrative processes and facilitate professional exchange within public sector organisations and with external actors. ICT tools may also affect formal lines of responsibility in policy-making, however, the effect of ICT on formal institutions is less pronounced in countries with strong formal responsibilities (e.g. Germany, Scandinavian countries). Apart from the countries’ respective administrative tradition, effects of ICT tools on policy design are shaped by (1) the set-up conditions, for example, whether the use of the tool is mandatory or not, (2) the behaviour of the actors involved, for example, whether they are motivated to use it, and (3) their means, i.e. the design characteristics and technical properties. Also, tools and their support structure need sufficient organisational, financial and political support. To achieve successful implementation, the expertise of a digitalisation agency may be beneficent. See D4.2 Research Report - Academic Expert Survey, D4.3 Comparative Case Studies and for a brief summary D4.4 Policy brief - Innovative collaboration for policy design through ICT.

 

Scientific publications

The WP4 team published a virtual special issue, Inside Governments: Digital Collaboration for Policy Design, hosted on the TROPCIO website, which compiles the WP4 core findings from conducting case studies on novel digital tools for policy design that have been introduced in Germany, France and Hungary. It contributes a much-needed perspective on the prospects of using such tools in formulating government policy, thus enabling decision-makers to focus more on the substance of policies and evidence-informed decisions.

 

Several articles were also published in scientific journals:

 

Carstens, N. (2021). Digitalisation Labs: A New Arena for Policy Design in German Multilevel Governance. German Politics.

Following a neo-institutionalist perspective and using the analytical concepts of multilevel governance and problem-solving, this paper investigates how the institutional settings, internal dynamics and actors’ composition influence policy design processes in the labs.

Fleischer, J., & Carstens, N (2021). Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: inside the digital transformation in Germany. Public Management Review.

The article discusses opportunities connected to the legitimacy and innovative policy design, and public accountability-related challenges when it comes to the boundary spanning in digitalization labs (created as a result of the implementation of the German Online Access Act).

Wanckel, C. (2021). Introducing a digital tool for sustainability impact assessments within the German Federal Government: A neo-institutional perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences.

This article examines the institutionalization of information technologies for policy formulation by investigating the case of the eNAP tool.

(upcoming) Defacqz, S., & Dupuy, C. (2021). A Transformative Change Through a Coordination Process and a Steering Agency. The Case of the Financial Information System of the French Central State. International Review of Administrative Sciences.

This article contributes to the empirical analysis of public administrations’ recent changes toward increased coordination at the central level by studying the implementation of the interministerial financial information system of the French central state – named Chorus.

 

Upcoming publications will be shared on the TROPICO community on the repository Zenodo.

 

The team

Under the leadership of the University of Potsdam (Germany), the following institutions have assembled a large team: Cardiff University (the UK), Central European University (Budapest, Hungary), French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)/Grenoble Institute of Political Studies (France), Hertie School (Berlin, Germany), KU Leuven (Belgium), Roskilde University (Denmark), Tallinn University of Technology (Estonia), University of Antwerp (Belgium), University of Bergen (Norway), University of Louvain (Belgium), and University of Zaragoza (Spain).

Downloads

Icon

D4.2 - Research Report - Academic Expert Survey 2.17 MB 589 downloads

This report presents a survey conducted with academic experts from various academic...

Icon

D4.3 - Comparative Case Studies 988.21 KB 725 downloads

The comparative analysis, based on five case studies in five European countries,...

Icon

D4.4 - Policy Brief - Innovative collaboration for policy design through ICT. Empirical observations and implications 818.49 KB 249 downloads

This Policy Brief summarises the empirical observations and implications resulting...

Icon

Article by Julia Fleischer and Nora Carstens - "Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: inside the digital transformation in Germany" 0.00 KB 41 downloads

The publication discusses opportunities connected to the legitimacy and innovative...

WP4 TEAM MEMBERS

Agnes Batory

Central European University, Budapest

Hungary

WP Leader: WP2 (2017-2020)

Jan Boon

University of Antwerp

Belgium

Chesney Callens

University of Antwerp

Belgium

Nora Carstens

University of Potsdam

Germany

Samuel Defacqz

UCLouvain

Belgium

Claire Dupuy

UCLouvain

Belgium

Julia Fleischer

University of Potsdam

Germany

WP Leader: WP4

Gerhard Hammerschmid

Hertie School, Berlin

Germany

WP Leader: WP6

Per Lægreid

University of Bergen

Norway

András Molnár

Central European University, Budapest

Hungary

Magnus Paulsen Hansen

Roskilde University

Denmark

Vicente Pina

University of Zaragoza

Spain

Andree Pruin

University of Potsdam

Germany

Tiina Randma Liiv

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia

WP Leader: WP5

Sonia Royo

University of Zaragoza

Spain

Lise H. Rykkja

University of Bergen

Norway

TROPICO Coordinator

Line Marie Sørsdal

University of Bergen

Norway

Sara Svensson

Central European University, Budapest

Hungary

Lourdes Torres

University of Zaragoza

Spain

Peter Triantafillou

Roskilde University

Denmark

WP Leader: WP8

Steven Van de Walle

KU Leuven

Belgium

WP Leader: WP3

Koen Verhoest

University of Antwerp

Belgium

WP Leader: WP7

Kadi Maria Vooglaid

Tallinn University of Technology

Estonia

Camilla Wanckel

University of Potsdam

Germany

Kai Wegrich

Hertie School, Berlin

Germany